赞
踩
前面提到的Dijkstra算法是一种广度优先搜索算法,它以广度作为优先级,这种特性决定了它在搜索到终点前会尽可能大范围的遍历所有节点。我们运行前文的代码,可以看到广度优先搜索的效果有点像“病毒扩散”。
但在实际工程应用中,我们希望减少对节点的收录,并使机器人可以尽快的找到搜索方向。我们的思路是加入一个启发式函数来引导路径的规划。
f
(
n
)
=
g
(
n
)
+
h
(
n
)
f(n) = g(n) + h(n)
f(n)=g(n)+h(n)
其中
加入启发式函数,可以形象的理解为终点的位置对规划产生了一个"引力",促使着收录节点时更快的向终点进发。所以起点和终点都在影响着A*算法的行为
所以A*算法能找到最短路径,依然保证最优性的条件是
h ( n ) ≤ h ( n ) 真 实 距 离 h(n) \leq h(n)_{真实距离} h(n)≤h(n)真实距离
A*算法在算法流程上只比Dijkstra算法多加入了启发式函数,其余没有变化
补充一些关于地图距离的知识点。不同的地图影响着启发式函数的值。
曼哈顿距离
如果机器人的行走规则中只允许朝上下左右四个方向移动,则使用曼哈顿距离来衡量两个点之间的距离。
def heuristic(node):
dx = abs(node.x - goal.x)
dy = abs(node.y - goal.y)
return D * (dx + dy) #D是代价
对角距离
如果机器人可以斜向行走,则使用对角距离。计算对角距离的函数如下
def heuristic(node):
dx = abs(node.x - goal.x)
dy = abs(node.y - goal.y)
return D * (dx + dy) + (D2 - 2 * D) * min(dx, dy)
其中D2是斜向行走的代价,它的计算如下
D
2
=
2
D
D2 = \sqrt 2 D
D2=2
D
欧式距离
欧几里得距离是指两个节点之间的直线距离。计算函数如下
def heuristic(node):
dx = abs(node.x - goal.x)
dy = abs(node.y - goal.y)
return D * sqrt(dx * dx + dy * dy)
定义机器人的运动规则有上下左右和斜向方式
def get_motion_model(): #相当于赋予权重
# dx, dy, cost(x轴方向,y轴方向,代价(距离))
motion = [[1, 0, 1],
[0, 1, 1],
[-1, 0, 1],
[0, -1, 1],
[-1, -1, math.sqrt(2)],
[-1, 1, math.sqrt(2)],
[1, -1, math.sqrt(2)],
[1, 1, math.sqrt(2)]]
return motion
因此启发式函数的计算采用对角距离
#启发式函数的计算采用对角距离
def calc_heuristic(self,goal_node,current_node):
D = 1
D2 = math.sqrt(2) * 1
dx = abs(goal_node.x - current_node.x)
dy = abs(goal_node.y - current_node.y)
return D * (dx + dy) + (D2 - 2 * D) * min(dx, dy)
完整代码如下:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt import math show_animation = True class Dijkstra: def __init__(self, ox, oy, resolution, robot_radius): """ Initialize map for planning ox: x position list of Obstacles [m] oy: y position list of Obstacles [m] resolution: grid resolution [m] rr: robot radius[m] """ self.min_x = None self.min_y = None self.max_x = None self.max_y = None self.x_width = None self.y_width = None self.obstacle_map = None self.resolution = resolution self.robot_radius = robot_radius self.calc_obstacle_map(ox, oy) #构建栅格地图(包含障碍物的膨胀) self.motion = self.get_motion_model() #规定路径权重 class Node: def __init__(self, x, y, cost, parent_index): self.x = x # index of grid self.y = y # index of grid self.cost = cost # g(n) self.parent_index = parent_index # index of previous Node 前一个结点 def __str__(self): return str(self.x) + "," + str(self.y) + "," + str( self.cost) + "," + str(self.parent_index) def planning(self, sx, sy, gx, gy): """ dijkstra path search input: s_x: start x position [m] s_y: start y position [m] gx: goal x position [m] gx: goal x position [m] output: rx: x position list of the final path ry: y position list of the final path """ #原始坐标转换成栅格坐标并赋给节点 start_node = self.Node(self.calc_xy_index(sx, self.min_x), self.calc_xy_index(sy, self.min_y), 0.0, -1) # round((position - minp) / self.resolution) goal_node = self.Node(self.calc_xy_index(gx, self.min_x), self.calc_xy_index(gy, self.min_y), 0.0, -1) open_set, closed_set = dict(), dict() # key - value: hash表 #calc_index是对节点的一个遍历标号 方便对节点的操作和定位 相当于key open_set[self.calc_index(start_node)] = start_node #起点先加入open_set while 1: #c_id取的是最小代价点的key c_id = min(open_set, key=lambda o: (open_set[o].cost + self.calc_heuristic(goal_node,open_set[o]))) # 取cost最小的节点 #当前节点 current = open_set[c_id] # show graph if show_animation: # pragma: no cover plt.plot(self.calc_position(current.x, self.min_x), self.calc_position(current.y, self.min_y), "xc") # for stopping simulation with the esc key. plt.gcf().canvas.mpl_connect( 'key_release_event', lambda event: [exit(0) if event.key == 'escape' else None]) if len(closed_set.keys()) % 10 == 0: plt.pause(0.001) # 判断是否是终点 if current.x == goal_node.x and current.y == goal_node.y: print("Find goal") goal_node.parent_index = current.parent_index goal_node.cost = current.cost break # Remove the item from the open set del open_set[c_id] # Add it to the closed set closed_set[c_id] = current # expand search grid based on motion model for move_x, move_y, move_cost in self.motion: node = self.Node(current.x + move_x, current.y + move_y, current.cost + move_cost, c_id) #c_id传入的是上一个被收录点的遍历索引 n_id = self.calc_index(node) if n_id in closed_set: #如果相邻点已经在closed_list 就不用收录了 continue if not self.verify_node(node): #符合地图的约束 continue if n_id not in open_set: #将新发现的节点收录 open_set[n_id] = node # Discover a new node else: if open_set[n_id].cost >= node.cost: # This path is the best until now. record it! open_set[n_id] = node #更新cost rx, ry = self.calc_final_path(goal_node, closed_set) return rx, ry def calc_final_path(self, goal_node, closed_set): # generate final course rx, ry = [self.calc_position(goal_node.x, self.min_x)], [ self.calc_position(goal_node.y, self.min_y)] parent_index = goal_node.parent_index while parent_index != -1: n = closed_set[parent_index] rx.append(self.calc_position(n.x, self.min_x)) ry.append(self.calc_position(n.y, self.min_y)) parent_index = n.parent_index return rx, ry #机器人的行走规则 def calc_heuristic(self,goal_node,current_node): D = 1 D2 = math.sqrt(2) * 1 dx = abs(goal_node.x - current_node.x) dy = abs(goal_node.y - current_node.y) return D * (dx + dy) + (D2 - 2 * D) * min(dx, dy) def calc_position(self, index, minp): pos = index * self.resolution + minp return pos def calc_xy_index(self, position, minp): return round((position - minp) / self.resolution) def calc_index(self, node): return node.y * self.x_width + node.x def verify_node(self, node): px = self.calc_position(node.x, self.min_x) py = self.calc_position(node.y, self.min_y) if px < self.min_x: return False if py < self.min_y: return False if px >= self.max_x: return False if py >= self.max_y: return False if self.obstacle_map[node.x][node.y]: return False return True def calc_obstacle_map(self, ox, oy): ''' 第1步:构建栅格地图 ''' #四个顶点 self.min_x = round(min(ox)) self.min_y = round(min(oy)) self.max_x = round(max(ox)) self.max_y = round(max(oy)) print("min_x:", self.min_x) print("min_y:", self.min_y) print("max_x:", self.max_x) print("max_y:", self.max_y) #栅格个数 self.x_width = round((self.max_x - self.min_x) / self.resolution) self.y_width = round((self.max_y - self.min_y) / self.resolution) print("x_width:", self.x_width) print("y_width:", self.y_width) # obstacle map generation # 初始化地图 self.obstacle_map = [[False for _ in range(self.y_width)] for _ in range(self.x_width)] # 设置障碍物 # x和y是栅格地图中的坐标 对障碍物做膨胀处理时要找到x和y在于原始地图的坐标 for ix in range(self.x_width): x = self.calc_position(ix, self.min_x) for iy in range(self.y_width): y = self.calc_position(iy, self.min_y) for iox, ioy in zip(ox, oy): d = math.hypot(iox - x, ioy - y) #原始地图中所有栅格距离障碍物的距离 if d <= self.robot_radius: #障碍物到附近点的距离小于机器人半径 机器人不能通过 self.obstacle_map[ix][iy] = True break @staticmethod def get_motion_model(): #相当于赋予权重 # dx, dy, cost(x轴方向,y轴方向,代价(距离)) motion = [[1, 0, 1], [0, 1, 1], [-1, 0, 1], [0, -1, 1], [-1, -1, math.sqrt(2)], [-1, 1, math.sqrt(2)], [1, -1, math.sqrt(2)], [1, 1, math.sqrt(2)]] return motion def main(): # start and goal position #起点 sx = -5.0 # [m] sy = -5.0 # [m] #终点 gx = 50.0 # [m] gy = 50.0 # [m] grid_size = 2.0 # [m] #栅格大小 robot_radius = 1.0 # [m] #机器人半径 # set obstacle positions ox, oy = [], [] #ox oy中存放的是障碍物在原始地图的坐标值 #四周墙面 for i in range(-10, 60): ox.append(i) oy.append(-10.0) for i in range(-10, 60): ox.append(60.0) oy.append(i) for i in range(-10, 61): ox.append(i) oy.append(60.0) for i in range(-10, 61): ox.append(-10.0) oy.append(i) #障碍物 for i in range(-10, 40): ox.append(20.0) oy.append(i) for i in range(0, 40): ox.append(40.0) oy.append(60.0 - i) #对墙面和障碍物画图 if show_animation: # pragma: no cover plt.plot(ox, oy, ".k") plt.plot(sx, sy, "og") plt.plot(gx, gy, "xb") plt.grid(True) plt.axis("equal") #创建Dijkstra对象 dijkstra = Dijkstra(ox, oy, grid_size, robot_radius) rx, ry = dijkstra.planning(sx, sy, gx, gy) if show_animation: # pragma: no cover plt.plot(rx, ry, "-r") plt.pause(0.01) plt.show() if __name__ == '__main__': main()
我们将Dijkstra算法的运行结果和A* 算法的结果放在一起可以发现,Dijkstra找到的是最短距离,但收录了大量节点,搜索速度慢。而A* 算法收录节点少,搜索速度快,但并不是最短距离。
Dijkstra算法效果:
A*算法效果:
我们把障碍物去掉,单纯比较算法的搜索速度可以发现,A* 算法最快的找到了终点,而Dijkstra收录了大量的节点,速度明显不如A* 算法。
Dijkstra算法效果:
A*算法效果:
Copyright © 2003-2013 www.wpsshop.cn 版权所有,并保留所有权利。