【surfaceflinger源码分析】surfaceflinger进程的消息驱动模型_surfaceflinger 源码分析

概述

对于surfaceflinger大多数人都知道它的功能是做图形合成的，用英语表示就是指composite。其大致框图如下:

• 各个Android app将自己的图形画面通过surface为载体通过AIDL接口(Binder IPC)传递到surfaceflinger进程
• surfaceflinger进程中的composition engine与HWC协商，哪些图层HWC可以直接显示，哪些图层需要自己合成为一个图层后再送给HWC显示。
• surfaceflinger与HWC把合成策略协商完后，再将合成后的图层和独立显示的图层分别传递给HWC，HWC再操作硬件显示在屏幕上。

本系列文章会深入分析surfaceflinger的各个方面，力争弄懂下列问题:

1. surfaceflinger做合成的动作是如何触发的？进程的消息模型是什么样的？ 如何驱动循环做合成动作的？
2. surface是什么？ surface与图形数据buffer有什么关系?
3. surface对应在surfaceflinger进程内用什么东西表示？各个app的图形数据buffer怎么传递过来的？
4. 图形数据在surfaceflinger进程内部流转过程是什么样的？
5. 既然涉及到跨进程传递，图形buffer的生产和消费是如何同步的？Fence是什么玩意？
6. Vsync是个什么意思？有什么用？
   
   本篇文章先来阅读源码分析下第一个问题。

surfaceflinger进程的main函数

int main(int, char**) {
    signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN);

    hardware::configureRpcThreadpool(1 /* maxThreads */,false /* callerWillJoin */);

    startGraphicsAllocatorService();

    // When SF is launched in its own process, limit the number of
    // binder threads to 4.
    ProcessState::self()->setThreadPoolMaxThreadCount(4);

    // start the thread pool
    sp<ProcessState> ps(ProcessState::self());
    ps->startThreadPool();

    // instantiate surfaceflinger
    sp<SurfaceFlinger> flinger = surfaceflinger::createSurfaceFlinger();

    setpriority(PRIO_PROCESS, 0, PRIORITY_URGENT_DISPLAY);

    set_sched_policy(0, SP_FOREGROUND);

    // Put most SurfaceFlinger threads in the system-background cpuset
    // Keeps us from unnecessarily using big cores
    // Do this after the binder thread pool init
    if (cpusets_enabled()) set_cpuset_policy(0, SP_SYSTEM);

    // initialize before clients can connect
    flinger->init();

    // publish surface flinger
    sp<IServiceManager> sm(defaultServiceManager());
    sm->addService(String16(SurfaceFlinger::getServiceName()), flinger, false,
                   IServiceManager::DUMP_FLAG_PRIORITY_CRITICAL | IServiceManager::DUMP_FLAG_PROTO);

    startDisplayService(); // dependency on SF getting registered above

    if (SurfaceFlinger::setSchedFifo(true) != NO_ERROR) {
        ALOGW("Couldn't set to SCHED_FIFO: %s", strerror(errno));
    }

    // run surface flinger in this thread
    flinger->run();

    return 0;
}
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46

上面的代码大致可以缩减为三句话:

int main(int, char**) {
    ..............................;
    sp<SurfaceFlinger> flinger = surfaceflinger::createSurfaceFlinger();
    ..............................;
    flinger->init();
    ..............................;
    flinger->run();

    return 0;
}
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

下面再分别看下这三个函数分别做了什么?

surfaceflinger::createSurfaceFlinger

sp<SurfaceFlinger> createSurfaceFlinger() {
    static DefaultFactory factory;
    return new SurfaceFlinger(factory);
}
1
2
3
4

surfaceflinger::init

主要是对子模块mCompositionEngine，Displays， RenderEngine等模块的初始化，貌似和消息传递关系不大，先放着不深入分析。

void SurfaceFlinger::init() {
    ALOGI(  "SurfaceFlinger's main thread ready to run. "
            "Initializing graphics H/W...");
    Mutex::Autolock _l(mStateLock);
    mCompositionEngine->setRenderEngine(renderengine::RenderEngine::create(
            renderengine::RenderEngineCreationArgs::Builder()
                .setPixelFormat(static_cast<int32_t>(defaultCompositionPixelFormat))
                .setImageCacheSize(maxFrameBufferAcquiredBuffers)
                .setUseColorManagerment(useColorManagement)
                .setEnableProtectedContext(enable_protected_contents(false))
                .setPrecacheToneMapperShaderOnly(false)
                .setSupportsBackgroundBlur(mSupportsBlur)
                .setContextPriority(useContextPriority
                        ? renderengine::RenderEngine::ContextPriority::HIGH
                        : renderengine::RenderEngine::ContextPriority::MEDIUM)
                .build()));
    mCompositionEngine->setTimeStats(mTimeStats);

    LOG_ALWAYS_FATAL_IF(mVrFlingerRequestsDisplay,
            "Starting with vr flinger active is not currently supported.");
    mCompositionEngine->setHwComposer(getFactory().createHWComposer(getBE().mHwcServiceName));
    mCompositionEngine->getHwComposer().setConfiguration(this, getBE().mComposerSequenceId);
    // Process any initial hotplug and resulting display changes.
    processDisplayHotplugEventsLocked();
    const auto display = getDefaultDisplayDeviceLocked();
    LOG_ALWAYS_FATAL_IF(!display, "Missing internal display after registering composer callback.");
    LOG_ALWAYS_FATAL_IF(!getHwComposer().isConnected(*display->getId()),
                        "Internal display is disconnected.");
    ................................................................;

    // initialize our drawing state
    mDrawingState = mCurrentState;

    // set initial conditions (e.g. unblank default device)
    initializeDisplays();

    char primeShaderCache[PROPERTY_VALUE_MAX];
    property_get("service.sf.prime_shader_cache", primeShaderCache, "1");
    if (atoi(primeShaderCache)) {
        getRenderEngine().primeCache();
    }

    // Inform native graphics APIs whether the present timestamp is supported:

    const bool presentFenceReliable =
            !getHwComposer().hasCapability(hal::Capability::PRESENT_FENCE_IS_NOT_RELIABLE);
    mStartPropertySetThread = getFactory().createStartPropertySetThread(presentFenceReliable);

    if (mStartPropertySetThread->Start() != NO_ERROR) {
        ALOGE("Run StartPropertySetThread failed!");
    }

    ALOGV("Done initializing");
}
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54

surfaceflinger::run

看到死循环了，哈哈，这应该就是本篇文章要找的死循环。看来要重点看下这个mEventQueue在wait什么Message了，哪里来的Message。

void SurfaceFlinger::run() {
    while (true) {
        mEventQueue->waitMessage();
    }
}
1
2
3
4
5

std::unique_ptr mEventQueue创建

SurfaceFlinger::SurfaceFlinger(Factory& factory, SkipInitializationTag)
      : mFactory(factory),
        mInterceptor(mFactory.createSurfaceInterceptor(this)),
        mTimeStats(std::make_shared<impl::TimeStats>()),
        mFrameTracer(std::make_unique<FrameTracer>()),
        mEventQueue(mFactory.createMessageQueue()),
        mCompositionEngine(mFactory.createCompositionEngine()),
        mInternalDisplayDensity(getDensityFromProperty("ro.sf.lcd_density", true)),
        mEmulatedDisplayDensity(getDensityFromProperty("qemu.sf.lcd_density", false)) {}
 
 std::unique_ptr<MessageQueue> DefaultFactory::createMessageQueue() {
    return std::make_unique<android::impl::MessageQueue>();
}
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

MessageQueue 的定义
可以看到MessageQueue类中还定义了一个Handler类。现在还不知道这些类中的成员变量和函数的作用。那么就从waitMessage()函数入手，一探究竟。

class MessageQueue final : public android::MessageQueue {
    class Handler : public MessageHandler {
        enum { eventMaskInvalidate = 0x1, eventMaskRefresh = 0x2, eventMaskTransaction = 0x4 };
        MessageQueue& mQueue;
        int32_t mEventMask;
        std::atomic<nsecs_t> mExpectedVSyncTime;
    public:
        explicit Handler(MessageQueue& queue) : mQueue(queue), mEventMask(0) {}
        virtual void handleMessage(const Message& message);
        void dispatchRefresh();
        void dispatchInvalidate(nsecs_t expectedVSyncTimestamp);
    };

    friend class Handler;

    sp<SurfaceFlinger> mFlinger;
    sp<Looper> mLooper;
    sp<EventThreadConnection> mEvents;
    gui::BitTube mEventTube;
    sp<Handler> mHandler;

    static int cb_eventReceiver(int fd, int events, void* data);
    int eventReceiver(int fd, int events);

public:
    ~MessageQueue() override = default;
    void init(const sp<SurfaceFlinger>& flinger) override;
    void setEventConnection(const sp<EventThreadConnection>& connection) override;

    void waitMessage() override;
    void postMessage(sp<MessageHandler>&&) override;

    // sends INVALIDATE message at next VSYNC
    void invalidate() override;

    // sends REFRESH message at next VSYNC
    void refresh() override;
};
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38

MessageQueue

waitMessage源码分析

void MessageQueue::waitMessage() {
    do {
        IPCThreadState::self()->flushCommands();
        int32_t ret = mLooper->pollOnce(-1);
        switch (ret) {
            case Looper::POLL_WAKE:
            case Looper::POLL_CALLBACK:
                continue;
            case Looper::POLL_ERROR:
                ALOGE("Looper::POLL_ERROR");
                continue;
            case Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT:
                // timeout (should not happen)
                continue;
            default:
                // should not happen
                ALOGE("Looper::pollOnce() returned unknown status %d", ret);
                continue;
        }
    } while (true);
}
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

看来要重点看下IPCThreadState和这个mLooper了
IPCThreadState这玩意是和Binder相关啊，看着这意思是要把Binder中的消息刷出来，看看各个app进程有没有通过Binder发消息过来。先放在着，后面回过头再来分析。

void IPCThreadState::flushCommands()
{
    if (mProcess->mDriverFD < 0)
        return;
    talkWithDriver(false);
    if (mOut.dataSize() > 0) {
        talkWithDriver(false);
    }
    if (mOut.dataSize() > 0) {
        ALOGW("mOut.dataSize() > 0 after flushCommands()");
    }
}
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

再来看看这个mLooper的实现。

class Looper : public RefBase {
protected:
    virtual ~Looper();
public：
    Looper(bool allowNonCallbacks);
    bool getAllowNonCallbacks() const;
    int pollOnce(int timeoutMillis, int* outFd, int* outEvents, void** outData);
    inline int pollOnce(int timeoutMillis) {
        return pollOnce(timeoutMillis, nullptr, nullptr, nullptr);
    }
    int pollAll(int timeoutMillis, int* outFd, int* outEvents, void** outData);
    inline int pollAll(int timeoutMillis) {
        return pollAll(timeoutMillis, nullptr, nullptr, nullptr);
    }
    void wake();
    int addFd(int fd, int ident, int events, Looper_callbackFunc callback, void* data);
    int addFd(int fd, int ident, int events, const sp<LooperCallback>& callback, void* data);
    int removeFd(int fd);
    void sendMessage(const sp<MessageHandler>& handler, const Message& message);
    void sendMessageDelayed(nsecs_t uptimeDelay, const sp<MessageHandler>& handler,
            const Message& message);
    void sendMessageAtTime(nsecs_t uptime, const sp<MessageHandler>& handler,
            const Message& message);
    void removeMessages(const sp<MessageHandler>& handler);
    void removeMessages(const sp<MessageHandler>& handler, int what);
    bool isPolling() const;
    static sp<Looper> prepare(int opts);
    static void setForThread(const sp<Looper>& looper);
    static sp<Looper> getForThread();
private:
    struct Request {
        int fd;
        int ident;
        int events;
        int seq;
        sp<LooperCallback> callback;
        void* data;

        void initEventItem(struct epoll_event* eventItem) const;
    };

    struct Response {
        int events;
        Request request;
    };

    struct MessageEnvelope {
        MessageEnvelope() : uptime(0) { }

        MessageEnvelope(nsecs_t u, const sp<MessageHandler> h,
                const Message& m) : uptime(u), handler(h), message(m) {
        }

        nsecs_t uptime;
        sp<MessageHandler> handler;
        Message message;
    };

    const bool mAllowNonCallbacks; // immutable

    android::base::unique_fd mWakeEventFd;  // immutable
    Mutex mLock;

    Vector<MessageEnvelope> mMessageEnvelopes; // guarded by mLock
    bool mSendingMessage; // guarded by mLock

    // Whether we are currently waiting for work.  Not protected by a lock,
    // any use of it is racy anyway.
    volatile bool mPolling;

    android::base::unique_fd mEpollFd;  // guarded by mLock but only modified on the looper thread
    bool mEpollRebuildRequired; // guarded by mLock

    // Locked list of file descriptor monitoring requests.
    KeyedVector<int, Request> mRequests;  // guarded by mLock
    int mNextRequestSeq;

    // This state is only used privately by pollOnce and does not require a lock since
    // it runs on a single thread.
    Vector<Response> mResponses;
    size_t mResponseIndex;
    nsecs_t mNextMessageUptime; // set to LLONG_MAX when none

    int pollInner(int timeoutMillis);
    int removeFd(int fd, int seq);
    void awoken();
    void pushResponse(int events, const Request& request);
    void rebuildEpollLocked();
    void scheduleEpollRebuildLocked();

    static void initTLSKey();
    static void threadDestructor(void *st);
    static void initEpollEvent(struct epoll_event* eventItem);
};
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94

先来看看这个pollOnce(-1)函数是在干啥 ？

    int pollOnce(int timeoutMillis, int* outFd, int* outEvents, void** outData);
    inline int pollOnce(int timeoutMillis) {
        return pollOnce(timeoutMillis, nullptr, nullptr, nullptr);
    }
1
2
3
4

int Looper::pollOnce(int timeoutMillis, int* outFd, int* outEvents, void** outData) {
    int result = 0;
    for (;;) {
        //因为参数outFd， outEvents， outData都为null，所以此while循环不用太关注，
        //如果mResponses中有事件，就将mResponseIndex加一返回，没有事件就执行下面的pollInner
        //下面重点关注mResponses里面的item在哪里push进去的
        while (mResponseIndex < mResponses.size()) {
            const Response& response = mResponses.itemAt(mResponseIndex++);
            int ident = response.request.ident;
            if (ident >= 0) {
                int fd = response.request.fd;
                int events = response.events;
                void* data = response.request.data;
                if (outFd != nullptr) *outFd = fd;
                if (outEvents != nullptr) *outEvents = events;
                if (outData != nullptr) *outData = data;
                return ident;
            }
        }

        if (result != 0) {
            if (outFd != nullptr) *outFd = 0;
            if (outEvents != nullptr) *outEvents = 0;
            if (outData != nullptr) *outData = nullptr;
            return result;
        }
        //重点关注下这个实现
        result = pollInner(timeoutMillis);
    }
}
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

pollInner干了什么 ？

int Looper::pollInner(int timeoutMillis) {
    //计算出timeoutMillis作为epoll_wait的timeout时长
    if (timeoutMillis != 0 && mNextMessageUptime != LLONG_MAX) {
        nsecs_t now = systemTime(SYSTEM_TIME_MONOTONIC);
        int messageTimeoutMillis = toMillisecondTimeoutDelay(now, mNextMessageUptime);
        if (messageTimeoutMillis >= 0
                && (timeoutMillis < 0 || messageTimeoutMillis < timeoutMillis)) {
            timeoutMillis = messageTimeoutMillis;
        }
    }
    // Poll.
    int result = POLL_WAKE;
    mResponses.clear();  //清空mResponses，我擦，看来mResponses就是在这里push和clear的
    mResponseIndex = 0;
    mPolling = true;

    struct epoll_event eventItems[EPOLL_MAX_EVENTS];
    //epoll_wait 等待事件的到来，后面再具体看下这个epoll中都有哪些被监控的文件句柄？
    int eventCount = epoll_wait(mEpollFd.get(), eventItems, EPOLL_MAX_EVENTS, timeoutMillis);
    mPolling = false;
    mLock.lock();
    ...........................;
    for (int i = 0; i < eventCount; i++) {
        int fd = eventItems[i].data.fd;
        uint32_t epollEvents = eventItems[i].events;
        if (fd == mWakeEventFd.get()) {
           ............................;
        } else {
            ssize_t requestIndex = mRequests.indexOfKey(fd);
            if (requestIndex >= 0) {
                int events = 0;
                if (epollEvents & EPOLLIN) events |= EVENT_INPUT;
                if (epollEvents & EPOLLOUT) events |= EVENT_OUTPUT;
                if (epollEvents & EPOLLERR) events |= EVENT_ERROR;
                if (epollEvents & EPOLLHUP) events |= EVENT_HANGUP;
                //将epoll监控到的event push到mResponses中
                pushResponse(events, mRequests.valueAt(requestIndex));
            } else {
                ALOGW("Ignoring unexpected epoll events 0x%x on fd %d that is "
                        "no longer registered.", epollEvents, fd);
            }
        }
    }
Done: 
    mNextMessageUptime = LLONG_MAX;
    //处理mMessageEnvelopes中具体message，这里面的message哪里来的，现在还不知道
    while (mMessageEnvelopes.size() != 0) {
        nsecs_t now = systemTime(SYSTEM_TIME_MONOTONIC);
        const MessageEnvelope& messageEnvelope = mMessageEnvelopes.itemAt(0);
        if (messageEnvelope.uptime <= now) {
            { // obtain handler
                sp<MessageHandler> handler = messageEnvelope.handler;
                Message message = messageEnvelope.message;
                mMessageEnvelopes.removeAt(0);
                mSendingMessage = true;
                mLock.unlock();
                handler->handleMessage(message); //需要重点分析的函数
            } // release handler

            mLock.lock();
            mSendingMessage = false;
            result = POLL_CALLBACK;
        } else {
            // The last message left at the head of the queue determines the next wakeup time.
            mNextMessageUptime = messageEnvelope.uptime;
            break;
        }
    }
    mLock.unlock();
    //处理epoll监控到的事件，通过提前注册的callback来处理此event，这些callback是什么时候注册的，现在还不知道
    for (size_t i = 0; i < mResponses.size(); i++) {
        Response& response = mResponses.editItemAt(i);
        if (response.request.ident == POLL_CALLBACK) {
            int fd = response.request.fd;
            int events = response.events;
            void* data = response.request.data;
            int callbackResult = response.request.callback->handleEvent(fd, events, data);
            if (callbackResult == 0) {
                removeFd(fd, response.request.seq);
            }
            response.request.callback.clear();
            result = POLL_CALLBACK;
        }
    }
    return result;
}
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86

通过上面的代码分析pollInner主要逻辑如下:

1. 通过epoll_wait监控获取event，将获取到的event封装成response结构push到mResponses中。
2. 处理mMessageEnvelopes中的message:
   sp handler = messageEnvelope.handler;
   Message message = messageEnvelope.message;
   handler->handleMessage(message);
3. 处理mResponses中每一个response：
   response.request.callback->handleEvent(fd, events, data)

现在新疑问来了，

1. mMessageEnvelopes中message哪里来的?
2. epoll中被监控的fd是什么后添加到epoll中的 ？

void MessageQueue::setEventConnection(const sp<EventThreadConnection>& connection) {
    if (mEventTube.getFd() >= 0) {
        mLooper->removeFd(mEventTube.getFd());
    }
    mEvents = connection;
    mEvents->stealReceiveChannel(&mEventTube);
    //往epoll中添加mEventTube的fd，其中MessageQueue::cb_eventReceiver是epoll监控到事件后执行的callback
    mLooper->addFd(mEventTube.getFd(), 0, Looper::EVENT_INPUT, MessageQueue::cb_eventReceiver,
                   this);
}
//找到答案了: "epoll中被监控的fd是什么后添加到epoll中的"
int Looper::addFd(int fd, int ident, int events, const sp<LooperCallback>& callback, void* data) {
    ....................;
    { // acquire lock
        AutoMutex _l(mLock);
        Request request;
        request.fd = fd;
        request.ident = ident;
        request.events = events;
        request.seq = mNextRequestSeq++;
        request.callback = callback;
        request.data = data;
        struct epoll_event eventItem;
        request.initEventItem(&eventItem);
        ssize_t requestIndex = mRequests.indexOfKey(fd);
        if (requestIndex < 0) {
            int epollResult = epoll_ctl(mEpollFd.get(), EPOLL_CTL_ADD, fd, &eventItem);
            mRequests.add(fd, request);
        } else {
          ........................;
        }
    } // release lock
    return 1;
}

int MessageQueue::cb_eventReceiver(int fd, int events, void* data) {
    MessageQueue* queue = reinterpret_cast<MessageQueue*>(data);
    //执行MessageQueue中的eventReceiver函数
    return queue->eventReceiver(fd, events);
}

int MessageQueue::eventReceiver(int /*fd*/, int /*events*/) {
    ssize_t n;
    DisplayEventReceiver::Event buffer[8];
    //监控到mEventTube中有事件后，从mEventTube中读取事件，处理事件
    while ((n = DisplayEventReceiver::getEvents(&mEventTube, buffer, 8)) > 0) {
        for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
            if (buffer[i].header.type == DisplayEventReceiver::DISPLAY_EVENT_VSYNC) {
                mHandler->dispatchInvalidate(buffer[i].vsync.expectedVSyncTimestamp);
                break;
            }
        }
    }
    return 1;
}

void MessageQueue::Handler::dispatchInvalidate(nsecs_t expectedVSyncTimestamp) {
    if ((android_atomic_or(eventMaskInvalidate, &mEventMask) & eventMaskInvalidate) == 0) {
        mExpectedVSyncTime = expectedVSyncTimestamp;
        //从mEventTube读取VSYNC事件后，先Looper中发一个MessageQueue::INVALIDATE类型的消息
        mQueue.mLooper->sendMessage(this, Message(MessageQueue::INVALIDATE));
    }
}

void Looper::sendMessage(const sp<MessageHandler>& handler, const Message& message) {
    nsecs_t now = systemTime(SYSTEM_TIME_MONOTONIC);
    sendMessageAtTime(now, handler, message);
}

void Looper::sendMessageDelayed(nsecs_t uptimeDelay, const sp<MessageHandler>& handler,
        const Message& message) {
    nsecs_t now = systemTime(SYSTEM_TIME_MONOTONIC);
    sendMessageAtTime(now + uptimeDelay, handler, message);
}

void Looper::sendMessageAtTime(nsecs_t uptime, const sp<MessageHandler>& handler,
        const Message& message) {
    { // acquire lock
        AutoMutex _l(mLock);

        size_t messageCount = mMessageEnvelopes.size();
        while (i < messageCount && uptime >= mMessageEnvelopes.itemAt(i).uptime) {
            i += 1;
        }
        MessageEnvelope messageEnvelope(uptime, handler, message);
        //找到答案了: "mMessageEnvelopes中message哪里来的?"
        mMessageEnvelopes.insertAt(messageEnvelope, i, 1);
        if (mSendingMessage) {
            return;
        }
    } // release lock
    if (i == 0) {
        wake();
    }
}
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95

上面的问题解答后，又来两个新疑问:

1. MessageQueue::setEventConnection(…) 什么时候有谁调用的 ？
2. mEventTube是个什么玩意？

下一篇文章继续深入分析，然后画图…