赞
踩
前提
最近在生产环境刚好遇到了延时任务的场景,调研了一下目前主流的方案,分析了一下优劣并且敲定了最终的方案。这篇文章记录了调研的过程,以及初步方案的实现。
候选方案对比
下面是想到的几种实现延时任务的方案,总结了一下相应的优势和劣势。
如果应用的数据量不高,实时性要求比较低,选用调度框架和MySQL进行短间隔轮询这个方案是最优的方案。但是笔者遇到的场景数据量相对比较大,实时性并不高,采用扫库的方案一定会对MySQL实例造成比较大的压力。记得很早之前,看过一个PPT叫《盒子科技聚合支付系统演进》,其中里面有一张图片给予笔者一点启发:
里面刚好用到了调度框架和Redis进行短间隔轮询实现延时任务的方案,不过为了分摊应用的压力,图中的方案还做了分片处理。鉴于笔者当前业务紧迫,所以在第一期的方案暂时不考虑分片,只做了一个简化版的实现。
由于PPT中没有任何的代码或者框架贴出,有些需要解决的技术点需要自行思考,下面会重现一次整个方案实现的详细过程。
场景设计
实际的生产场景是笔者负责的某个系统需要对接一个外部的资金方,每一笔资金下单后需要延时30分钟推送对应的附件。这里简化为一个订单信息数据延迟处理的场景,就是每一笔下单记录一条订单消息(暂时叫做OrderMessage),订单消息需要延迟5到15秒后进行异步处理。
否决的候选方案实现思路
下面介绍一下其它四个不选用的候选方案,结合一些伪代码和流程分析一下实现过程。
JDK内置延迟队列
DelayQueue是一个阻塞队列的实现,它的队列元素必须是Delayed的子类,这里做个简单的例子:
public class DelayQueueMain { private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(DelayQueueMain.class); public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { DelayQueue<OrderMessage> queue = new DelayQueue<>(); // 默认延迟5秒 OrderMessage message = new OrderMessage("ORDER_ID_10086"); queue.add(message); // 延迟6秒 message = new OrderMessage("ORDER_ID_10087", 6); queue.add(message); // 延迟10秒 message = new OrderMessage("ORDER_ID_10088", 10); queue.add(message); ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(r -> { Thread thread = new Thread(r); thread.setName("DelayWorker"); thread.setDaemon(true); return thread; }); LOGGER.info("开始执行调度线程..."); executorService.execute(() -> { while (true) { try { OrderMessage task = queue.take(); LOGGER.info("延迟处理订单消息,{}", task.getDescription()); } catch (Exception e) { LOGGER.error(e.getMessage(), e); } } }); Thread.sleep(Integer.MAX_VALUE); } private static class OrderMessage implements Delayed { private static final DateTimeFormatter F = DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss"); /** * 默认延迟5000毫秒 */ private static final long DELAY_MS = 1000L * 5; /** * 订单ID */ private final String orderId; /** * 创建时间戳 */ private final long timestamp; /** * 过期时间 */ private final long expire; /** * 描述 */ private final String description; public OrderMessage(String orderId, long expireSeconds) { this.orderId = orderId; this.timestamp = System.currentTimeMillis(); this.expire = this.timestamp + expireSeconds * 1000L; this.description = String.format("订单[%s]-创建时间为:%s,超时时间为:%s", orderId, LocalDateTime.ofInstant(Instant.ofEpochMilli(timestamp), ZoneId.systemDefault()).format(F), LocalDateTime.ofInstant(Instant.ofEpochMilli(expire), ZoneId.systemDefault()).format(F)); } public OrderMessage(String orderId) { this.orderId = orderId; this.timestamp = System.currentTimeMillis(); this.expire = this.timestamp + DELAY_MS; this.description = String.format("订单[%s]-创建时间为:%s,超时时间为:%s", orderId, LocalDateTime.ofInstant(Instant.ofEpochMilli(timestamp), ZoneId.systemDefault()).format(F), LocalDateTime.ofInstant(Instant.ofEpochMilli(expire), ZoneId.systemDefault()).format(F)); } public String getOrderId() { return orderId; } public long getTimestamp() { return timestamp; } public long getExpire() { return expire; } public String getDescription() { return description; } @Override public long getDelay(TimeUnit unit) { return unit.convert(this.expire - System.currentTimeMillis(), TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS); } @Override public int compareTo(Delayed o) { return (int) (this.getDelay(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS) - o.getDelay(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)); } } }
注意一下,OrderMessage实现Delayed接口,关键是需要实现Delayed#getDelay()和Delayed#compareTo()。运行一下main()方法:
10:16:08.240 [main] INFO club.throwable.delay.DelayQueueMain - 开始执行调度线程... 10:16:13.224 [DelayWorker] INFO club.throwable.delay.DelayQueueMain - 延迟处理订单消息,订单[ORDER_ID_10086]-创建时间为:2019-08-20 10:16:08,超时时间为:2019-08-20 10:16:13 10:16:14.237 [DelayWorker] INFO club.throwable.delay.DelayQueueMain - 延迟处理订单消息,订单[ORDER_ID_10087]-创建时间为:2019-08-20 10:16:08,超时时间为:2019-08-20 10:16:14 10:16:18.237 [DelayWorker] INFO club.throwable.delay.DelayQueueMain - 延迟处理订单消息,订单[ORDER_ID_10088]-创建时间为:2019-08-20 10:16:08,超时时间为:2019-08-20 10:16:18
调度框架 + MySQL
使用调度框架对MySQL表进行短间隔轮询是实现难度比较低的方案,通常服务刚上线,表数据不多并且实时性不高的情况下应该首选这个方案。不过要注意以下几点:
注意轮询间隔不能太短,否则会对MySQL实例产生影响。
注意每次查询的数量,结果集数量太多有可能会导致调度阻塞和占用应用大量内存,从而影响时效性。
注意要设计状态值和最大重试次数,这样才能尽量避免大量数据积压和重复查询的问题。
最好通过时间列做索引,查询指定时间范围内的数据。
引入Quartz、MySQL的Java驱动包和spring-boot-starter-jdbc(这里只是为了方便用相对轻量级的框架实现,生产中可以按场景按需选择其他更合理的框架):
<dependency> <groupId>mysql</groupId> <artifactId>mysql-connector-java</artifactId> <version>5.1.48</version> <scope>test</scope> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId> <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-jdbc</artifactId> <version>2.1.7.RELEASE</version> <scope>test</scope> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.quartz-scheduler</groupId> <artifactId>quartz</artifactId> <version>2.3.1</version> <scope>test</scope> </dependency>
假设表设计如下:
CREATE DATABASE `delayTask` CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 COLLATE utf8mb4_unicode_520_ci; USE `delayTask`; CREATE TABLE `t_order_message` ( id BIGINT UNSIGNED PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT, order_id VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL COMMENT '订单ID', create_time DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP COMMENT '创建日期时间', edit_time DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP COMMENT '修改日期时间', retry_times TINYINT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 COMMENT '重试次数', order_status TINYINT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 COMMENT '订单状态', INDEX idx_order_id (order_id), INDEX idx_create_time (create_time) ) COMMENT '订单信息表'; # 写入两条测试数据 INSERT INTO t_order_message(order_id) VALUES ('10086'),('10087');
编写代码:
// 常量 public class OrderConstants { public static final int MAX_RETRY_TIMES = 5; public static final int PENDING = 0; public static final int SUCCESS = 1; public static final int FAIL = -1; public static final int LIMIT = 10; } // 实体 @Builder @Data public class OrderMessage { private Long id; private String orderId; private LocalDateTime createTime; private LocalDateTime editTime; private Integer retryTimes; private Integer orderStatus; } // DAO @RequiredArgsConstructor public class OrderMessageDao { private final JdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate; private static final ResultSetExtractor<List<OrderMessage>> M = r -> { List<OrderMessage> list = Lists.newArrayList(); while (r.next()) { list.add(OrderMessage.builder() .id(r.getLong("id")) .orderId(r.getString("order_id")) .createTime(r.getTimestamp("create_time").toLocalDateTime()) .editTime(r.getTimestamp("edit_time").toLocalDateTime()) .retryTimes(r.getInt("retry_times")) .orderStatus(r.getInt("order_status")) .build()); } return list; }; public List<OrderMessage> selectPendingRecords(LocalDateTime start, LocalDateTime end, List<Integer> statusList, int maxRetryTimes, int limit) { StringJoiner joiner = new StringJoiner(","); statusList.forEach(s -> joiner.add(String.valueOf(s))); return jdbcTemplate.query("SELECT * FROM t_order_message WHERE create_time >= ? AND create_time <= ? " + "AND order_status IN (?) AND retry_times < ? LIMIT ?", p -> { p.setTimestamp(1, Timestamp.valueOf(start)); p.setTimestamp(2, Timestamp.valueOf(end)); p.setString(3, joiner.toString()); p.setInt(4, maxRetryTimes); p.setInt(5, limit); }, M); } public int updateOrderStatus(Long id, int status) { return jdbcTemplate.update("UPDATE t_order_message SET order_status = ?,edit_time = ? WHERE id =?", p -> { p.setInt(1, status); p.setTimestamp(2, Timestamp.valueOf(LocalDateTime.now())); p.setLong(3, id); }); } } // Service @RequiredArgsConstructor public class OrderMessageService { private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(OrderMessageService.class); private final OrderMessageDao orderMessageDao; private static final List<Integer> STATUS = Lists.newArrayList(); static { STATUS.add(OrderConstants.PENDING); STATUS.add(OrderConstants.FAIL); } public void executeDelayJob() { LOGGER.info("订单处理定时任务开始执行......"); LocalDateTime end = LocalDateTime.now(); // 一天前 LocalDateTime start = end.minusDays(1); List<OrderMessage> list = orderMessageDao.selectPendingRecords(start, end, STATUS, OrderConstants.MAX_RETRY_TIMES, OrderConstants.LIMIT); if (!list.isEmpty()) { for (OrderMessage m : list) { LOGGER.info("处理订单[{}],状态由{}更新为{}", m.getOrderId(), m.getOrderStatus(), OrderConstants.SUCCESS); // 这里其实可以优化为批量更新 orderMessageDao.updateOrderStatus(m.getId(), OrderConstants.SUCCESS); } } LOGGER.info("订单处理定时任务开始完毕......"); } } // Job @DisallowConcurrentExecution public class OrderMessageDelayJob implements Job { @Override public void execute(JobExecutionContext jobExecutionContext) throws JobExecutionException { OrderMessageService service = (OrderMessageService) jobExecutionContext.getMergedJobDataMap().get("orderMessageService"); service.executeDelayJob(); } public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { HikariConfig config = new HikariConfig(); config.setJdbcUrl("jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/delayTask?useSSL=false&characterEncoding=utf8"); config.setDriverClassName(Driver.class.getName()); config.setUsername("root"); config.setPassword("root"); HikariDataSource dataSource = new HikariDataSource(config); OrderMessageDao orderMessageDao = new OrderMessageDao(new JdbcTemplate(dataSource)); OrderMessageService service = new OrderMessageService(orderMessageDao); // 内存模式的调度器 StdSchedulerFactory factory = new StdSchedulerFactory(); Scheduler scheduler = factory.getScheduler(); // 这里没有用到IOC容器,直接用Quartz数据集合传递服务引用 JobDataMap jobDataMap = new JobDataMap(); jobDataMap.put("orderMessageService", service); // 新建Job JobDetail job = JobBuilder.newJob(OrderMessageDelayJob.class) .withIdentity("orderMessageDelayJob", "delayJob") .usingJobData(jobDataMap) .build(); // 新建触发器,10秒执行一次 Trigger trigger = TriggerBuilder.newTrigger() .withIdentity("orderMessageDelayTrigger", "delayJob") .withSchedule(SimpleScheduleBuilder.simpleSchedule().withIntervalInSeconds(10).repeatForever()) .build(); scheduler.scheduleJob(job, trigger); // 启动调度器 scheduler.start(); Thread.sleep(Integer.MAX_VALUE); } }
这个例子里面用了create_time做轮询,实际上可以添加一个调度时间schedule_time列做轮询,这样子才能更容易定制空闲时和忙碌时候的调度策略。上面的示例的运行效果如下:
11:58:27.202 [main] INFO org.quartz.core.QuartzScheduler - Scheduler meta-data: Quartz Scheduler (v2.3.1) 'DefaultQuartzScheduler' with instanceId 'NON_CLUSTERED' Scheduler class: 'org.quartz.core.QuartzScheduler' - running locally. NOT STARTED. Currently in standby mode. Number of jobs executed: 0 Using thread pool 'org.quartz.simpl.SimpleThreadPool' - with 10 threads. Using job-store 'org.quartz.simpl.RAMJobStore' - which does not support persistence. and is not clustered. 11:58:27.202 [main] INFO org.quartz.impl.StdSchedulerFactory - Quartz scheduler 'DefaultQuartzScheduler' initialized from default resource file in Quartz package: 'quartz.properties' 11:58:27.202 [main] INFO org.quartz.impl.StdSchedulerFactory - Quartz scheduler version: 2.3.1 11:58:27.209 [main] INFO org.quartz.core.QuartzScheduler - Scheduler DefaultQuartzScheduler_$_NON_CLUSTERED started. 11:58:27.212 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_QuartzSchedulerThread] DEBUG org.quartz.core.QuartzSchedulerThread - batch acquisition of 1 triggers 11:58:27.217 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_QuartzSchedulerThread] DEBUG org.quartz.simpl.PropertySettingJobFactory - Producing instance of Job 'delayJob.orderMessageDelayJob', class=club.throwable.jdbc.OrderMessageDelayJob 11:58:27.219 [HikariPool-1 connection adder] DEBUG com.zaxxer.hikari.pool.HikariPool - HikariPool-1 - Added connection com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4Connection@10eb8c53 11:58:27.220 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_QuartzSchedulerThread] DEBUG org.quartz.core.QuartzSchedulerThread - batch acquisition of 0 triggers 11:58:27.221 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-1] DEBUG org.quartz.core.JobRunShell - Calling execute on job delayJob.orderMessageDelayJob 11:58:34.440 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-1] INFO club.throwable.jdbc.OrderMessageService - 订单处理定时任务开始执行...... 11:58:34.451 [HikariPool-1 connection adder] DEBUG com.zaxxer.hikari.pool.HikariPool - HikariPool-1 - Added connection com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4Connection@3d27ece4 11:58:34.459 [HikariPool-1 connection adder] DEBUG com.zaxxer.hikari.pool.HikariPool - HikariPool-1 - Added connection com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4Connection@64e808af 11:58:34.470 [HikariPool-1 connection adder] DEBUG com.zaxxer.hikari.pool.HikariPool - HikariPool-1 - Added connection com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4Connection@79c8c2b7 11:58:34.477 [HikariPool-1 connection adder] DEBUG com.zaxxer.hikari.pool.HikariPool - HikariPool-1 - Added connection com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4Connection@19a62369 11:58:34.485 [HikariPool-1 connection adder] DEBUG com.zaxxer.hikari.pool.HikariPool - HikariPool-1 - Added connection com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4Connection@1673d017 11:58:34.485 [HikariPool-1 connection adder] DEBUG com.zaxxer.hikari.pool.HikariPool - HikariPool-1 - After adding stats (total=10, active=0, idle=10, waiting=0) 11:58:34.559 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-1] DEBUG org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate - Executing prepared SQL query 11:58:34.565 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-1] DEBUG org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate - Executing prepared SQL statement [SELECT * FROM t_order_message WHERE create_time >= ? AND create_time <= ? AND order_status IN (?) AND retry_times < ? LIMIT ?] 11:58:34.645 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-1] DEBUG org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceUtils - Fetching JDBC Connection from DataSource 11:58:35.210 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-1] DEBUG org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate - SQLWarning ignored: SQL state '22007', error code '1292', message [Truncated incorrect DOUBLE value: '0,-1'] 11:58:35.335 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-1] INFO club.throwable.jdbc.OrderMessageService - 处理订单[10086],状态由0更新为1 11:58:35.342 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-1] DEBUG org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate - Executing prepared SQL update 11:58:35.346 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-1] DEBUG org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate - Executing prepared SQL statement [UPDATE t_order_message SET order_status = ?,edit_time = ? WHERE id =?] 11:58:35.347 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-1] DEBUG org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceUtils - Fetching JDBC Connection from DataSource 11:58:35.354 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-1] INFO club.throwable.jdbc.OrderMessageService - 处理订单[10087],状态由0更新为1 11:58:35.355 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-1] DEBUG org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate - Executing prepared SQL update 11:58:35.355 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-1] DEBUG org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate - Executing prepared SQL statement [UPDATE t_order_message SET order_status = ?,edit_time = ? WHERE id =?] 11:58:35.355 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-1] DEBUG org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceUtils - Fetching JDBC Connection from DataSource 11:58:35.361 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-1] INFO club.throwable.jdbc.OrderMessageService - 订单处理定时任务开始完毕...... 11:58:35.363 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_QuartzSchedulerThread] DEBUG org.quartz.core.QuartzSchedulerThread - batch acquisition of 1 triggers 11:58:37.206 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_QuartzSchedulerThread] DEBUG org.quartz.simpl.PropertySettingJobFactory - Producing instance of Job 'delayJob.orderMessageDelayJob', class=club.throwable.jdbc.OrderMessageDelayJob 11:58:37.206 [DefaultQuartzScheduler_QuartzSchedulerThread] DEBUG org.quartz.core.QuartzSchedulerThread - batch acquisition of 0 triggers
RabbitMQ死信队列
使用RabbitMQ死信队列依赖于RabbitMQ的两个特性:TTL和DLX。
TTL:Time To Live,消息存活时间,包括两个维度:队列消息存活时间和消息本身的存活时间。
DLX:Dead Letter Exchange,死信交换器。
画个图描述一下这两个特性:
下面为了简单起见,TTL使用了针对队列的维度。引入RabbitMQ的Java驱动:
<dependency> <groupId>com.rabbitmq</groupId> <artifactId>amqp-client</artifactId> <version>5.7.3</version> <scope>test</scope> </dependency>
代码如下:
public class DlxMain { private static final DateTimeFormatter F = DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss"); private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(DlxMain.class); public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { ConnectionFactory factory = new ConnectionFactory(); Connection connection = factory.newConnection(); Channel producerChannel = connection.createChannel(); Channel consumerChannel = connection.createChannel(); // dlx交换器名称为dlx.exchange,类型是direct,绑定键为dlx.key,队列名为dlx.queue producerChannel.exchangeDeclare("dlx.exchange", "direct"); producerChannel.queueDeclare("dlx.queue", false, false, false, null); producerChannel.queueBind("dlx.queue", "dlx.exchange", "dlx.key"); Map<String, Object> queueArgs = new HashMap<>(); // 设置队列消息过期时间,5秒 queueArgs.put("x-message-ttl", 5000); // 指定DLX相关参数 queueArgs.put("x-dead-letter-exchange", "dlx.exchange"); queueArgs.put("x-dead-letter-routing-key", "dlx.key"); // 声明业务队列 producerChannel.queueDeclare("business.queue", false, false, false, queueArgs); ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(r -> { Thread thread = new Thread(r); thread.setDaemon(true); thread.setName("DlxConsumer"); return thread; }); // 启动消费者 executorService.execute(() -> { try { consumerChannel.basicConsume("dlx.queue", true, new DlxConsumer(consumerChannel)); } catch (IOException e) { LOGGER.error(e.getMessage(), e); } }); OrderMessage message = new OrderMessage("10086"); producerChannel.basicPublish("", "business.queue", MessageProperties.TEXT_PLAIN, message.getDescription().getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_8)); LOGGER.info("发送消息成功,订单ID:{}", message.getOrderId()); message = new OrderMessage("10087"); producerChannel.basicPublish("", "business.queue", MessageProperties.TEXT_PLAIN, message.getDescription().getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_8)); LOGGER.info("发送消息成功,订单ID:{}", message.getOrderId()); message = new OrderMessage("10088"); producerChannel.basicPublish("", "business.queue", MessageProperties.TEXT_PLAIN, message.getDescription().getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_8)); LOGGER.info("发送消息成功,订单ID:{}", message.getOrderId()); Thread.sleep(Integer.MAX_VALUE); } private static class DlxConsumer extends DefaultConsumer { DlxConsumer(Channel channel) { super(channel); } @Override public void handleDelivery(String consumerTag, Envelope envelope, AMQP.BasicProperties properties, byte[] body) throws IOException { LOGGER.info("处理消息成功:{}", new String(body, StandardCharsets.UTF_8)); } } private static class OrderMessage { private final String orderId; private final long timestamp; private final String description; OrderMessage(String orderId) { this.orderId = orderId; this.timestamp = System.currentTimeMillis(); this.description = String.format("订单[%s],订单创建时间为:%s", orderId, LocalDateTime.ofInstant(Instant.ofEpochMilli(timestamp), ZoneId.systemDefault()).format(F)); } public String getOrderId() { return orderId; } public long getTimestamp() { return timestamp; } public String getDescription() { return description; } } }
运行main()方法结果如下:
16:35:58.638 [main] INFO club.throwable.dlx.DlxMain - 发送消息成功,订单ID:10086 16:35:58.641 [main] INFO club.throwable.dlx.DlxMain - 发送消息成功,订单ID:10087 16:35:58.641 [main] INFO club.throwable.dlx.DlxMain - 发送消息成功,订单ID:10088 16:36:03.646 [pool-1-thread-4] INFO club.throwable.dlx.DlxMain - 处理消息成功:订单[10086],订单创建时间为:2019-08-20 16:35:58 16:36:03.670 [pool-1-thread-5] INFO club.throwable.dlx.DlxMain - 处理消息成功:订单[10087],订单创建时间为:2019-08-20 16:35:58 16:36:03.670 [pool-1-thread-6] INFO club.throwable.dlx.DlxMain - 处理消息成功:订单[10088],订单创建时间为:2019-08-20 16:35:58
时间轮
时间轮TimingWheel是一种高效、低延迟的调度数据结构,底层采用数组实现存储任务列表的环形队列,示意图如下:
这里暂时不对时间轮和其实现作分析,只简单举例说明怎么使用时间轮实现延时任务。这里使用Netty提供的HashedWheelTimer,引入依赖:
<dependency> <groupId>io.netty</groupId> <artifactId>netty-common</artifactId> <version>4.1.39.Final</version> </dependency>
代码如下:
public class HashedWheelTimerMain { private static final DateTimeFormatter F = DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS"); public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { AtomicInteger counter = new AtomicInteger(); ThreadFactory factory = r -> { Thread thread = new Thread(r); thread.setDaemon(true); thread.setName("HashedWheelTimerWorker-" + counter.getAndIncrement()); return thread; }; // tickDuration - 每tick一次的时间间隔, 每tick一次就会到达下一个槽位 // unit - tickDuration的时间单位 // ticksPerWhee - 时间轮中的槽位数 Timer timer = new HashedWheelTimer(factory, 1, TimeUnit.SECONDS, 60); TimerTask timerTask = new DefaultTimerTask("10086"); timer.newTimeout(timerTask, 5, TimeUnit.SECONDS); timerTask = new DefaultTimerTask("10087"); timer.newTimeout(timerTask, 10, TimeUnit.SECONDS); timerTask = new DefaultTimerTask("10088"); timer.newTimeout(timerTask, 15, TimeUnit.SECONDS); Thread.sleep(Integer.MAX_VALUE); } private static class DefaultTimerTask implements TimerTask { private final String orderId; private final long timestamp; public DefaultTimerTask(String orderId) { this.orderId = orderId; this.timestamp = System.currentTimeMillis(); } @Override public void run(Timeout timeout) throws Exception { System.out.println(String.format("任务执行时间:%s,订单创建时间:%s,订单ID:%s", LocalDateTime.now().format(F), LocalDateTime.ofInstant(Instant.ofEpochMilli(timestamp), ZoneId.systemDefault()).format(F), orderId)); } } }
运行结果:
任务执行时间:2019-08-20 17:19:49.310,订单创建时间:2019-08-20 17:19:43.294,订单ID:10086 任务执行时间:2019-08-20 17:19:54.297,订单创建时间:2019-08-20 17:19:43.301,订单ID:10087 任务执行时间:2019-08-20 17:19:59.297,订单创建时间:2019-08-20 17:19:43.301,订单ID:10088
一般来说,任务执行的时候应该使用另外的业务线程池,以免阻塞时间轮本身的运动。
选用的方案实现过程
最终选用了基于Redis的有序集合Sorted Set和Quartz短轮询进行实现。具体方案是:
订单创建的时候,订单ID和当前时间戳分别作为Sorted Set的member和score添加到订单队列Sorted Set中。
订单创建的时候,订单ID和推送内容JSON字符串分别作为field和value添加到订单队列内容Hash中。
第1步和第2步操作的时候用Lua脚本保证原子性。
使用一个异步线程通过Sorted Set的命令ZREVRANGEBYSCORE弹出指定数量的订单ID对应的订单队列内容Hash中的订单推送内容数据进行处理。
对于第4点处理有两种方案:
方案一:弹出订单内容数据的同时进行数据删除,也就是ZREVRANGEBYSCORE、ZREM和HDEL命令要在同一个Lua脚本中执行,这样的话Lua脚本的编写难度大,并且由于弹出数据已经在Redis中删除,如果数据处理失败则可能需要从数据库重新查询补偿。
方案二:弹出订单内容数据之后,在数据处理完成的时候再主动删除订单队列Sorted Set和订单队列内容Hash中对应的数据,这样的话需要控制并发,有重复执行的可能性。
最终暂时选用了方案一,也就是从Sorted Set弹出订单ID并且从Hash中获取完推送数据之后马上删除这两个集合中对应的数据。方案的流程图大概是这样:
这里先详细说明一下用到的Redis命令。
Sorted Set相关命令
ZADD命令 - 将一个或多个成员元素及其分数值加入到有序集当中。
ZADD KEY SCORE1 VALUE1.. SCOREN VALUEN
ZREVRANGEBYSCORE命令 - 返回有序集中指定分数区间内的所有的成员。有序集成员按分数值递减(从大到小)的次序排列。
ZREVRANGEBYSCORE key max min [WITHSCORES] [LIMIT offset count]
max:分数区间 - 最大分数。
min:分数区间 - 最小分数。
WITHSCORES:可选参数,是否返回分数值,指定则会返回得分值。
LIMIT:可选参数,offset和count原理和MySQL的LIMIT offset,size一致,如果不指定此参数则返回整个集合的数据。
ZREM命令 - 用于移除有序集中的一个或多个成员,不存在的成员将被忽略。
ZREM key member [member ...]
Hash相关命令
HMSET命令 - 同时将多个field-value(字段-值)对设置到哈希表中。
HMSET KEY_NAME FIELD1 VALUE1 ...FIELDN VALUEN
HDEL命令 - 删除哈希表key中的一个或多个指定字段,不存在的字段将被忽略。
HDEL KEY_NAME FIELD1.. FIELDN
Lua相关
加载Lua脚本并且返回脚本的SHA-1字符串:SCRIPT LOAD script。
执行已经加载的Lua脚本:EVALSHA sha1 numkeys key [key ...] arg [arg ...]。
unpack函数可以把table类型的参数转化为可变参数,不过需要注意的是unpack函数必须使用在非变量定义的函数调用的最后一个参数,否则会失效,详细见Stackoverflow的提问table.unpack() only returns the first element。
PS:如果不熟悉Lua语言,建议系统学习一下,因为想用好Redis,一定离不开Lua。
引入依赖:
<dependencyManagement> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId> <artifactId>spring-boot-dependencies</artifactId> <version>2.1.7.RELEASE</version> <type>pom</type> <scope>import</scope> </dependency> </dependencies> </dependencyManagement> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>org.quartz-scheduler</groupId> <artifactId>quartz</artifactId> <version>2.3.1</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>redis.clients</groupId> <artifactId>jedis</artifactId> <version>3.1.0</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId> <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-web</artifactId> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId> <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-jdbc</artifactId> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.springframework</groupId> <artifactId>spring-context-support</artifactId> <version>5.1.9.RELEASE</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.projectlombok</groupId> <artifactId>lombok</artifactId> <version>1.18.8</version> <scope>provided</scope> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>com.alibaba</groupId> <artifactId>fastjson</artifactId> <version>1.2.59</version> </dependency> </dependencies>
编写Lua脚本/lua/enqueue.lua和/lua/dequeue.lua:
-- /lua/enqueue.lua local zset_key = KEYS[1] local hash_key = KEYS[2] local zset_value = ARGV[1] local zset_score = ARGV[2] local hash_field = ARGV[3] local hash_value = ARGV[4] redis.call('ZADD', zset_key, zset_score, zset_value) redis.call('HSET', hash_key, hash_field, hash_value) return nil -- /lua/dequeue.lua -- 参考jesque的部分Lua脚本实现 local zset_key = KEYS[1] local hash_key = KEYS[2] local min_score = ARGV[1] local max_score = ARGV[2] local offset = ARGV[3] local limit = ARGV[4] -- TYPE命令的返回结果是{'ok':'zset'}这样子,这里利用next做一轮迭代 local status, type = next(redis.call('TYPE', zset_key)) if status ~= nil and status == 'ok' then if type == 'zset' then local list = redis.call('ZREVRANGEBYSCORE', zset_key, max_score, min_score, 'LIMIT', offset, limit) if list ~= nil and #list > 0 then -- unpack函数能把table转化为可变参数 redis.call('ZREM', zset_key, unpack(list)) local result = redis.call('HMGET', hash_key, unpack(list)) redis.call('HDEL', hash_key, unpack(list)) return result end end end return nil
编写核心API代码:
- // Jedis提供者
- @Component
- public class JedisProvider implements InitializingBean {
- private JedisPool jedisPool;
- @Override
- public void afterPropertiesSet() throws Exception {
- jedisPool = new JedisPool();
- }
- public Jedis provide(){
- return jedisPool.getResource();
- }
- }
- // OrderMessage
- @Data
- public class OrderMessage {
- private String orderId;
- private BigDecimal amount;
- private Long userId;
- }
- // 延迟队列接口
- public interface OrderDelayQueue {
- void enqueue(OrderMessage message);
- List<OrderMessage> dequeue(String min, String max, String offset, String limit);
- List<OrderMessage> dequeue();
- String enqueueSha();
- String dequeueSha();
- }
- // 延迟队列实现类
- @RequiredArgsConstructor
- @Component
- public class RedisOrderDelayQueue implements OrderDelayQueue, InitializingBean {
- private static final String MIN_SCORE = "0";
- private static final String OFFSET = "0";
- private static final String LIMIT = "10";
- private static final String ORDER_QUEUE = "ORDER_QUEUE";
- private static final String ORDER_DETAIL_QUEUE = "ORDER_DETAIL_QUEUE";
- private static final String ENQUEUE_LUA_SCRIPT_LOCATION = "/lua/enqueue.lua";
- private static final String DEQUEUE_LUA_SCRIPT_LOCATION = "/lua/dequeue.lua";
- private static final AtomicReference<String> ENQUEUE_LUA_SHA = new AtomicReference<>();
- private static final AtomicReference<String> DEQUEUE_LUA_SHA = new AtomicReference<>();
- private static final List<String> KEYS = Lists.newArrayList();
- private final JedisProvider jedisProvider;
- static {
- KEYS.add(ORDER_QUEUE);
- KEYS.add(ORDER_DETAIL_QUEUE);
- }
- @Override
- public void enqueue(OrderMessage message) {
- List<String> args = Lists.newArrayList();
- args.add(message.getOrderId());
- args.add(String.valueOf(System.currentTimeMillis()));
- args.add(message.getOrderId());
- args.add(JSON.toJSONString(message));
- try (Jedis jedis = jedisProvider.provide()) {
- jedis.evalsha(ENQUEUE_LUA_SHA.get(), KEYS, args);
- }
- }
- @Override
- public List<OrderMessage> dequeue() {
- // 30分钟之前
- String maxScore = String.valueOf(System.currentTimeMillis() - 30 * 60 * 1000);
- return dequeue(MIN_SCORE, maxScore, OFFSET, LIMIT);
- }
- @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
- @Override
- public List<OrderMessage> dequeue(String min, String max, String offset, String limit) {
- List<String> args = new ArrayList<>();
- args.add(max);
- args.add(min);
- args.add(offset);
- args.add(limit);
- List<OrderMessage> result = Lists.newArrayList();
- try (Jedis jedis = jedisProvider.provide()) {
- List<String> eval = (List<String>) jedis.evalsha(DEQUEUE_LUA_SHA.get(), KEYS, args);
- if (null != eval) {
- for (String e : eval) {
- result.add(JSON.parseObject(e, OrderMessage.class));
- }
- }
- }
- return result;
- }
- @Override
- public String enqueueSha() {
- return ENQUEUE_LUA_SHA.get();
- }
- @Override
- public String dequeueSha() {
- return DEQUEUE_LUA_SHA.get();
- }
- @Override
- public void afterPropertiesSet() throws Exception {
- // 加载Lua脚本
- loadLuaScript();
- }
- private void loadLuaScript() throws Exception {
- try (Jedis jedis = jedisProvider.provide()) {
- ClassPathResource resource = new ClassPathResource(ENQUEUE_LUA_SCRIPT_LOCATION);
- String luaContent = StreamUtils.copyToString(resource.getInputStream(), StandardCharsets.UTF_8);
- String sha = jedis.scriptLoad(luaContent);
- ENQUEUE_LUA_SHA.compareAndSet(null, sha);
- resource = new ClassPathResource(DEQUEUE_LUA_SCRIPT_LOCATION);
- luaContent = StreamUtils.copyToString(resource.getInputStream(), StandardCharsets.UTF_8);
- sha = jedis.scriptLoad(luaContent);
- DEQUEUE_LUA_SHA.compareAndSet(null, sha);
- }
- }
- public static void main(String[] as) throws Exception {
- DateTimeFormatter f = DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS");
- JedisProvider jedisProvider = new JedisProvider();
- jedisProvider.afterPropertiesSet();
- RedisOrderDelayQueue queue = new RedisOrderDelayQueue(jedisProvider);
- queue.afterPropertiesSet();
- // 写入测试数据
- OrderMessage message = new OrderMessage();
- message.setAmount(BigDecimal.valueOf(10086));
- message.setOrderId("ORDER_ID_10086");
- message.setUserId(10086L);
- message.setTimestamp(LocalDateTime.now().format(f));
- List<String> args = Lists.newArrayList();
- args.add(message.getOrderId());
- // 测试需要,score设置为30分钟之前
- args.add(String.valueOf(System.currentTimeMillis() - 30 * 60 * 1000));
- args.add(message.getOrderId());
- args.add(JSON.toJSONString(message));
- try (Jedis jedis = jedisProvider.provide()) {
- jedis.evalsha(ENQUEUE_LUA_SHA.get(), KEYS, args);
- }
- List<OrderMessage> dequeue = queue.dequeue();
- System.out.println(dequeue);
- }
- }
这里先执行一次main()方法验证一下延迟队列是否生效:
[OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_10086, amount=10086, userId=10086, timestamp=2019-08-21 08:32:22.885)]
确定延迟队列的代码没有问题,接着编写一个Quartz的Job类型的消费者OrderMessageConsumer:
- @DisallowConcurrentExecution
- @Component
- public class OrderMessageConsumer implements Job {
- private static final AtomicInteger COUNTER = new AtomicInteger();
- private static final ExecutorService BUSINESS_WORKER_POOL = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors(), r -> {
- Thread thread = new Thread(r);
- thread.setDaemon(true);
- thread.setName("OrderMessageConsumerWorker-" + COUNTER.getAndIncrement());
- return thread;
- });
- private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(OrderMessageConsumer.class);
- @Autowired
- private OrderDelayQueue orderDelayQueue;
- @Override
- public void execute(JobExecutionContext jobExecutionContext) throws JobExecutionException {
- StopWatch stopWatch = new StopWatch();
- stopWatch.start();
- LOGGER.info("订单消息处理定时任务开始执行......");
- List<OrderMessage> messages = orderDelayQueue.dequeue();
- if (!messages.isEmpty()) {
- // 简单的列表等分放到线程池中执行
- List<List<OrderMessage>> partition = Lists.partition(messages, 2);
- int size = partition.size();
- final CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(size);
- for (List<OrderMessage> p : partition) {
- BUSINESS_WORKER_POOL.execute(new ConsumeTask(p, latch));
- }
- try {
- latch.await();
- } catch (InterruptedException ignore) {
- //ignore
- }
- }
- stopWatch.stop();
- LOGGER.info("订单消息处理定时任务执行完毕,耗时:{} ms......", stopWatch.getTotalTimeMillis());
- }
- @RequiredArgsConstructor
- private static class ConsumeTask implements Runnable {
- private final List<OrderMessage> messages;
- private final CountDownLatch latch;
- @Override
- public void run() {
- try {
- // 实际上这里应该单条捕获异常
- for (OrderMessage message : messages) {
- LOGGER.info("处理订单信息,内容:{}", message);
- }
- } finally {
- latch.countDown();
- }
- }
- }
- }
上面的消费者设计的时候需要有以下考量:
使用@DisallowConcurrentExecution注解不允许Job并发执行,其实多个Job并发执行意义不大,因为我们采用的是短间隔的轮询,而Redis是单线程处理命令,在客户端做多线程其实效果不佳。
线程池BUSINESS_WORKER_POOL的线程容量或者队列应该综合LIMIT值、等分订单信息列表中使用的size值以及ConsumeTask里面具体的执行时间进行考虑,这里只是为了方便使用了固定容量的线程池。
ConsumeTask中应该对每一条订单信息的处理单独捕获异常和吞并异常,或者把处理单个订单信息的逻辑封装成一个不抛出异常的方法。
其他Quartz相关的代码:
- // Quartz配置类
- @Configuration
- public class QuartzAutoConfiguration {
- @Bean
- public SchedulerFactoryBean schedulerFactoryBean(QuartzAutowiredJobFactory quartzAutowiredJobFactory) {
- SchedulerFactoryBean factory = new SchedulerFactoryBean();
- factory.setAutoStartup(true);
- factory.setJobFactory(quartzAutowiredJobFactory);
- return factory;
- }
- @Bean
- public QuartzAutowiredJobFactory quartzAutowiredJobFactory() {
- return new QuartzAutowiredJobFactory();
- }
- public static class QuartzAutowiredJobFactory extends AdaptableJobFactory implements BeanFactoryAware {
- private AutowireCapableBeanFactory autowireCapableBeanFactory;
- @Override
- public void setBeanFactory(BeanFactory beanFactory) throws BeansException {
- this.autowireCapableBeanFactory = (AutowireCapableBeanFactory) beanFactory;
- }
- @Override
- protected Object createJobInstance(TriggerFiredBundle bundle) throws Exception {
- Object jobInstance = super.createJobInstance(bundle);
- // 这里利用AutowireCapableBeanFactory从新建的Job实例做一次自动装配,得到一个原型(prototype)的JobBean实例
- autowireCapableBeanFactory.autowireBean(jobInstance);
- return jobInstance;
- }
- }
- }
这里暂时使用了内存态的RAMJobStore去存放任务和触发器的相关信息,如果在生产环境最好替换成基于MySQL也就是JobStoreTX进行集群化,最后是启动函数和CommandLineRunner的实现:
- @SpringBootApplication(exclude = {DataSourceAutoConfiguration.class, TransactionAutoConfiguration.class})
- public class Application implements CommandLineRunner {
- @Autowired
- private Scheduler scheduler;
- @Autowired
- private JedisProvider jedisProvider;
- public static void main(String[] args) {
- SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args);
- }
- @Override
- public void run(String... args) throws Exception {
- // 准备一些测试数据
- prepareOrderMessageData();
- JobDetail job = JobBuilder.newJob(OrderMessageConsumer.class)
- .withIdentity("OrderMessageConsumer", "DelayTask")
- .build();
- // 触发器5秒触发一次
- Trigger trigger = TriggerBuilder.newTrigger()
- .withIdentity("OrderMessageConsumerTrigger", "DelayTask")
- .withSchedule(SimpleScheduleBuilder.simpleSchedule().withIntervalInSeconds(5).repeatForever())
- .build();
- scheduler.scheduleJob(job, trigger);
- }
- private void prepareOrderMessageData() throws Exception {
- DateTimeFormatter f = DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS");
- try (Jedis jedis = jedisProvider.provide()) {
- List<OrderMessage> messages = Lists.newArrayList();
- for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
- OrderMessage message = new OrderMessage();
- message.setAmount(BigDecimal.valueOf(i));
- message.setOrderId("ORDER_ID_" + i);
- message.setUserId((long) i);
- message.setTimestamp(LocalDateTime.now().format(f));
- messages.add(message);
- }
- // 这里暂时不使用Lua
- Map<String, Double> map = Maps.newHashMap();
- Map<String, String> hash = Maps.newHashMap();
- for (OrderMessage message : messages) {
- // 故意把score设计成30分钟前
- map.put(message.getOrderId(), Double.valueOf(String.valueOf(System.currentTimeMillis() - 30 * 60 * 1000)));
- hash.put(message.getOrderId(), JSON.toJSONString(message));
- }
- jedis.zadd("ORDER_QUEUE", map);
- jedis.hmset("ORDER_DETAIL_QUEUE", hash);
- }
- }
- }
输出结果如下:
2019-08-21 22:45:59.518 INFO 33000 --- [ryBean_Worker-1] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 订单消息处理定时任务开始执行...... 2019-08-21 22:45:59.525 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-4] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_91, amount=91, userId=91, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:45:59.525 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-2] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_95, amount=95, userId=95, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:45:59.525 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-1] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_97, amount=97, userId=97, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:45:59.525 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-0] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_99, amount=99, userId=99, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:45:59.525 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-3] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_93, amount=93, userId=93, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:45:59.539 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-2] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_94, amount=94, userId=94, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:45:59.539 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-1] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_96, amount=96, userId=96, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:45:59.539 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-3] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_92, amount=92, userId=92, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:45:59.539 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-0] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_98, amount=98, userId=98, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:45:59.539 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-4] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_90, amount=90, userId=90, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:45:59.540 INFO 33000 --- [ryBean_Worker-1] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 订单消息处理定时任务执行完毕,耗时:22 ms...... 2019-08-21 22:46:04.515 INFO 33000 --- [ryBean_Worker-2] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 订单消息处理定时任务开始执行...... 2019-08-21 22:46:04.516 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-5] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_89, amount=89, userId=89, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:46:04.516 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-6] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_87, amount=87, userId=87, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:46:04.516 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-7] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_85, amount=85, userId=85, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:46:04.516 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-5] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_88, amount=88, userId=88, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:46:04.516 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-2] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_83, amount=83, userId=83, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:46:04.516 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-1] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_81, amount=81, userId=81, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:46:04.516 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-6] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_86, amount=86, userId=86, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:46:04.516 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-2] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_82, amount=82, userId=82, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:46:04.516 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-7] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_84, amount=84, userId=84, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:46:04.516 INFO 33000 --- [onsumerWorker-1] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 处理订单信息,内容:OrderMessage(orderId=ORDER_ID_80, amount=80, userId=80, timestamp=2019-08-21 22:45:59.475) 2019-08-21 22:46:04.516 INFO 33000 --- [ryBean_Worker-2] club.throwable.OrderMessageConsumer : 订单消息处理定时任务执行完毕,耗时:1 ms...... ......
首次执行的时候涉及到一些组件的初始化,会比较慢,后面看到由于我们只是简单打印订单信息,所以定时任务执行比较快。如果在不调整当前架构的情况下,生产中需要注意:
切换JobStore为JDBC模式,Quartz官方有完整教程,或者看笔者之前翻译的Quartz文档。
需要监控或者收集任务的执行状态,添加预警等等。
这里其实有一个性能隐患,命令ZREVRANGEBYSCORE的时间复杂度可以视为为O(N),N是集合的元素个数,由于这里把所有的订单信息都放进了同一个Sorted Set(ORDER_QUEUE)中,所以在一直有新增数据的时候,dequeue脚本的时间复杂度一直比较高,后续订单量升高之后会此处一定会成为性能瓶颈,后面会给出解决的方案。
小结
这篇文章主要从一个实际生产案例的仿真例子入手,分析了当前延时任务的一些实现方案,还基于Redis和Quartz给出了一个完整的示例。当前的示例只是处于可运行的状态,有些问题尚未解决。下一篇文章会着眼于解决两个方面的问题:
分片。
监控。
还有一点,架构是基于业务形态演进出来的,很多东西需要结合场景进行方案设计和改进,思路仅供参考,切勿照搬代码。
免费分享Java技术资料,需要的可以在关注后私信我
作者:Throwable
来源:掘金
Copyright © 2003-2013 www.wpsshop.cn 版权所有,并保留所有权利。